<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments for GreatSite.com	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://greatsite.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://greatsite.com</link>
	<description>THE WORLD&#039;S LARGEST DEALER OF RARE AND ANTIQUE BIBLES</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2023 20:59:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.1.7</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		Comment on Antique Bibles vs. Rare Bibles vs. Valuable Bibles by John Jeffcoat		</title>
		<link>https://greatsite.com/antique-rare-valuable-bibles/#comment-3212</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Jeffcoat]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2023 20:59:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://greatsite.com/?p=9263#comment-3212</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://greatsite.com/antique-rare-valuable-bibles/#comment-3211&quot;&gt;The Market Value of Rarity - Will Seippel&lt;/a&gt;.

Will Seippel: I just got this odd message directly from Wordpress - the software platform I used to design my website at GREATSITE.COM - alerting me to the fact that Will Seippel had supposedly &quot;responded to my post&quot; today, which I wrote about &quot;Antique Bibles vs. Rare Bibles vs. Valuable Bibles&quot; on the blog page of my website... even though I have my blog page set up to not accept any replies. I clicked on the link to read your own posting here: https://willseippel.com/the-market-value-of-rarity/  ... in which there appears to contain a very brief paraphrasing of a comment from my own blog (which is fine). Wordpress is asking me to &quot;approve or trash&quot; your reply.  I cannot see your reply anywhere... certainly not on my blog page, which again, does not accept replies anyway.  I am confused.  Where is this reply or comment that you posted for me today?  It is not on my website, not on my blog, not on your blog... and this is the first time in the two years that I have been using Wordpress that they have ever reached out to me to claim that someone replied to one of my blog postings.  Perhaps you can help me understand that nature of what has just happened?  Thanks. - John Jeffcoat (GREATSITE.COM)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://greatsite.com/antique-rare-valuable-bibles/#comment-3211">The Market Value of Rarity &#8211; Will Seippel</a>.</p>
<p>Will Seippel: I just got this odd message directly from WordPress &#8211; the software platform I used to design my website at GREATSITE.COM &#8211; alerting me to the fact that Will Seippel had supposedly &#8220;responded to my post&#8221; today, which I wrote about &#8220;Antique Bibles vs. Rare Bibles vs. Valuable Bibles&#8221; on the blog page of my website&#8230; even though I have my blog page set up to not accept any replies. I clicked on the link to read your own posting here: <a href="https://willseippel.com/the-market-value-of-rarity/" rel="nofollow ugc">https://willseippel.com/the-market-value-of-rarity/</a>  &#8230; in which there appears to contain a very brief paraphrasing of a comment from my own blog (which is fine). WordPress is asking me to &#8220;approve or trash&#8221; your reply.  I cannot see your reply anywhere&#8230; certainly not on my blog page, which again, does not accept replies anyway.  I am confused.  Where is this reply or comment that you posted for me today?  It is not on my website, not on my blog, not on your blog&#8230; and this is the first time in the two years that I have been using WordPress that they have ever reached out to me to claim that someone replied to one of my blog postings.  Perhaps you can help me understand that nature of what has just happened?  Thanks. &#8211; John Jeffcoat (GREATSITE.COM)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on Antique Bibles vs. Rare Bibles vs. Valuable Bibles by The Market Value of Rarity - Will Seippel		</title>
		<link>https://greatsite.com/antique-rare-valuable-bibles/#comment-3211</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Market Value of Rarity - Will Seippel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2023 19:23:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://greatsite.com/?p=9263#comment-3211</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] it’s a small piece, not because it can be played in one minute (it takes two, as written); and rare antiques are always valuable (they’re not; age and rarity alone are not reliable indicators of value). How [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] it’s a small piece, not because it can be played in one minute (it takes two, as written); and rare antiques are always valuable (they’re not; age and rarity alone are not reliable indicators of value). How [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
